Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(1):5-16

Evaluation of Opioid-Dependent Prisoners in Oral Opioid Maintenance Therapy

Metz V., Matzenauer C., Kammerer K., Winklbaur B., Ebner N., Radler D., Fischer G.

Correspondence: Prof. Gabriele Fischer, Medical University of Vienna, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Waehringer Guertel 18-20 - 1090 Vienna, Austria

Phone: +43 1 40400 2117; Fax: +43 1 40400 3629; E-mail: gabriele.fischer@meduniwien.ac.at

Summary: Background: Opioid maintenance treatment is available in prison in many countries, but without a specific methodology or homogeneity. The aim of our study was to investigate characteristics and differences among opioid-dependent prisoners in an Austrian penitentiary. Methods: Structured assessments were obtained from 57 (78.1%) of 73 opioid-maintained prisoners on their demographic data, imprisonment terms, health status and quality of life. Results: From 1996 until 2007, the number of opioid-maintained detainees increased by 444%. Prisoners treated with methadone had significantly more convictions (p=0.036) and a longer duration of polydrug abuse (p=0.093) and opioid consumption (p=0.05) than patients maintained on slow-release morphine. Conclusions: There is a strong need for a diversification of opioid maintenance treatments, as well as the development of a specific methodology for the use of therapeutic opioids in prison.

 

Publication Type: Regular article

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(1):17-24

Dose Determination in Dual Diagnosed Heroin Addicts during Methadone Treatment

Maremmani I., Pacini M., Canoniero S., Deltito J., Maremmani A. G. I., Tagliamonte A.

Correspondence: Icro Maremmani, MD; Vincent P. Dole Dual Diagnosis Unit, Santa Chiara University Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67 56100 PISA, Italy, EU. Phone +39 0584 790073 Fax +39 0584 72081 E-Mail: maremman@med.unipi.it

Summary: Ninety-nine consecutive responders to treatment for heroin addiction (54 with one or more Axis I psychiatric diagnosis (DD-patients), and 45 without psychiatric comorbidity (NDD-patients), were monitored prospectively (20 months on average, min.1, max. 51), in order to achieve some useful clinical information pertaining to effective methadone dose determination for double diagnosed heroin addicts. First day and first month dosages do not differ between the two groups. Stabilization dosages are higher in DD patients than in NDD patients. The time to reach stabilization phase is longer in DD patients than in NDD patients. Tapering of methadone follows a similar trend in both groups. DD patients need more attention from clinicians, especially when stabilization dosage has to be established.

Publication Type: Regular article

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(1):25-32

Urine Labelling Marker System for Drug Testing Improves Patient Compliance

Simojoki K., Alho A.

Correspondence: Hannu Alho, Ph.D., M.D.; National Institute of Health and Welfare, Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services. POB 30, 00271 Helsinki, Finland

Phone: +358-20-6108123 Fax: +358-20-6108133 E-mail: hannu.alho@thl.fi

Summary: Urine drug testing plays an important role in substance abuse treatments. When strictly controlled, as it often is, urine sampling creates a humiliating situation and ties up resources. A new sample labelling method has been developed to make supervision unnecessary. This innovation is achieved by labelling the urine with polyethylene glycols. In this study, 57 patients who required urine sampling were randomized into two groups, the traditional supervised (TS) group and the new marker (NM) group. The urine test return rate was 98.3% in the NM group and 100% in the TS group. Attempts to manipulate the urine samples were discovered in 2% of the NM group and 0% of the TS group. Most patients preferred the NM testing method. The personnel too preferred the NM system, and estimated that it reduced their workload dedicated to drug screening by 50%. We conclude that the NM method is more acceptable to patients and personnel, and may increase compliance as a result.

Publication Type: Regular Article

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(1):33-36

Quality of Life As a Means of Assessing Outcome in Opioid Dependence Treatment

Torrens M.

Correspondence: Marta Torrens MD, Drug Addiction Unit, IAPS-Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, E-mail mtorrens@imas.imim.es

Summary: Not available

Publication Type: Letter to the editor

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(1):37-40

Why There Has Been an Excess of Overdoses in Norway Since 1990?

Haraldsen M.

Correspondence: Martin Haraldsen, Rodslia 12, 3222 Sandefjord, Norway

 E-mail: mar.har@c2i.net

Summary: Not available

Publication Type:

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(2):5-8

Addiction: Challenging the dual diagnosis construct

Pani P. P.

Correspondence: Pier Paolo Pani, ASL 8 Cagliari, Direzione dei Servizi Socio-Sanitari, Cittadella della Salute – Padiglione Q, Via Romagna 16 – 09127 Cagliari, Italy.

Phone +39 070 6096385/ +39 349 3280112; Fax: +39 070 6096387 E-Mail: pallolo@tin.it

Summary: Not Available

Publication Type: Editorial

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(2):9-18

Adherence and social antecedents in relation to outcome in Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT)

Gronbladh L., Öhlund L. S.

Correspondence: Leif Grönbladh, MD, University Hospital, Se-75017 Uppsala, Sweden, EU, E-mail: Leif.Gronbladh@neuro.uu.se, Leif.Gronblad@akademiska.se

Summary: Numerous reports of the effectiveness of methadone in reducing opiate use as well as mortality, criminality, prostitution and the risk for HIV-infection have been published during the last forty years. However, poor adherence to treatment, continuing drug use and increasing rate of premature termination may lead to less than optimal outcome results or in too many cases death. The aim of this paper is to investigate which of the background variables, collected at the admission procedure, that can be used to tell which type of patient will adhere to the treatment regime and succeed or who will fail and who either need special considerations or ought not to be accepted for a methadone treatment (MMT). As much as 86 percent of the compliers in this study did benefit from the treatment and were rated as medium to very much improved according to CGI-I. The group not improved or worse had significantly more background problems such as school problems, a history of non-opioid abuse, many non-MMT treatment episodes, low age at drug debut and opioid debut than the group much or very much improved. Those moderately improved is usually situated somewhere in between the others.

Publication Type: Regular article

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(2):19-24

Additional take-home dosages

Rupnik J. C.

Correspondence: Jasna Cuk Rupnik, MD - CPZOPD Logatec, Notranjska 2, 1370 Logatec, Slovenia, EU

Phone. +386 17508264, +386 17508220, Fax +386 17508222

e-mail: cukovi@gmail.com, cpzopd@zd-logatec.si

Summary: Objectives: The objective of the study was to analyse the practice of giving take-home dosages of opioid medications to patients with reference to the reasons for and the quantity of the medications given as additional or extra take-home dosages. Methods: All the patients were checked regarding the kind of medication, urine samples, reasons for extra take-home dosages and their quantity. Results: Of the 150 patients selected for the group in the programme, 27 needed one or more extra take-home dosages in 2007. 10 (11*) of those patients had negative urine samples for all illicit drugs and never used alcohol at any stage of the year of the study. 7 patients used marijuana, benzodiazepines or alcohol only once or just occasionally in that year. 10 patients used other illicit drugs or used alcohol and benzodiazepines more often. Among the reasons for extra take-home dosages, hard physical work was listed 7 times, vomiting because of the bad taste of the medication 3 times, difficulties in intiating medical therapy after entering the programme 3 times, vomiting as a part of illness twice and lowering the dosage too quickly twice. Other reasons were listed once each. Altogether, the percentage of the overall quantity of medications received by patients during the year as extra take-home dosages was: 0.47% for methadone, 0.75% for buprenorphine and 0.10% for SR morphine. Conclusions: Reviewing the fairly good results of treatment at the centre, therapeutic decisions to give additional take-home dosages to the patients have proved to be reasonable and usually correct. Throughout this study a continual therapeutic wish to achieve a better understanding of opioid addiction as just one among other chronic diseases has been made evident.

Publication Type: Regular article

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(2):25-28

From methadone to buprenorphine or back to methadone. The Croatian experience

Ivancic A.

Correspondence: Ante Ivancic, MD. Centre for Adddiction Treatment, M.Gioseffi 2 52 440 Porec, Croatia

E-mail ante.ivancic@pu.t-com.hr

Summary: In Croatia maintenance treatment is made widely available through a network of GP offices that covers the whole of the country. More then 50% of all GPs in Croatia have at least one patient in MT. Methadone was the only opioid agonist used for over a decade, but this changed when buprenorphine was introduced 4 years ago.

There is little difference in the regimen for the prescription and provision of the two medications: both are free of charge and are prescribed by GPs; in addition, there are no restrictions on the dose to be used or on ‘take home’ policy. The decision on which medication will be used is based exclusively on the clinical assessment and patient-doctor agreement.

The example of Croatia gives an opportunity to compare the acceptance of this medication by patients and doctors in situations of equal availability.

Publication Type: Brief Communication

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(2):29-36

Methadone treatment for pregnant heroin addicted women

Finnegan L., Pacini M., Maremmani I.

Correspondence: Finnegan Loretta, MD - Perinatal Addiction and Women's Health, 700 Ocean Drive, Unit E-1, 08202 Avalon New Jersey, USA - E-mail: finnegal337@aol.com

Summary: A review of methadone-related issues and the approach to heroin addicted patients is presented with the aim to clarify what is practiced by the establishment of anti-craving treatment and what is expected within a history of addiction. A series of clinical situations occurring throughout pregnancy to early child development are described, and the etiological hypothesis discussed. Moreover, some methodological considerations are described in order to better understand some ambiguity about the effectiveness and harmlessness of methadone treatment, particularly with regard to neonatal opiate withdrawal. Limitations to the outcome of pregnancies in heroin addicted women seems to be due to misconceptions about methadone toxicity and neonatal damage, which may lead to the mishandling of methadone as a therapeutic modality, especially with regard to maintenance at effective dosages.

Publication Type: Seminar

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(2):37-40

What is the right dosage for our patients?

Ulmer A.

Summary: Not Available

Publication Type: Letter to the editor


Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(3):5-8

Psychological performance and sedation following injectable opioid administration

Forzisi L., Mitchell T. B., Bond A., Lintzeris N., Spofforth N., Strang J.

Correspondence: Dr Luciana Forzisi, National Addiction Centre, 4 Windsor Walk, London SE58AF, UK - Tel: +44079510575814 Email: luciana.forzisi@kcl.ac.uk

Summary: Injectable opioid treatment (IOT) can be an effective strategy for heroin users who respond poorly to treatment with oral methadone, but its safety profile is yet to be fully characterised. This study assessed the risks of sedation and impaired psychological performance in 13 IOT patients following injection of their regular dose of heroin (n=7) or methadone (n=6). Measures of psychological performance (digit symbol substitution task, DSST; cancellation task, CT) and sedation (visual analogue scale, VAS) were taken at baseline and 15, 30 and 60 minutes post-injection. Comparisons were made between the methadone and heroin groups, with reference to data collected in control groups maintained on oral methadone or sublingual buprenorphine. Results indicated that performance and sedation did not change significantly in the hour after injection. However, patients prescribed injectable heroin or injectable methadone showed significantly worse psychological performance at the time of peak effect compared to patients prescribed oral methadone or buprenorphine. These findings suggest that further research is required to characterise possible psychological performance deficit in IOT patients

Publication Type: Regular article

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(3):9-19

Treatment practices and perceived challenges for European physicians treating opioid dependence

Bacha J., Reast S., Pearlstone A.

Correspondence: Alisa Pearlstone, PCM Scientific, 5 Greenwich View Place, London E14 9NN, United Kingdom, Tel: +44 (0)20 7531 6693.

Summary: This survey investigated the current practices and challenges of physicians treating opioid dependence in Germany, France, Italy and the UK. Doses favoured in Europe appeared to conflict with recommended best practice, with low mean methadone and buprenorphine maintenance doses reported (44.3 and 9.5 mg, respectively). Mean time to buprenorphine maintenance doses was longer than recommended at 14.4 days. Respondents also rated diversion and misuse management as their most difficult challenge in treating opioid dependence. These data suggest that prescribing practices are likely to increase this problem, as well as impeding treatment success by decreasing compliance and retention.

Publication Type: Regular article

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(3):21-30

Clinical foundations for the use of methadone in patients with infectious diseases

Somaini L., Pacini M., Maremmani I.

Correspondence: Lorenzo Somaini, MD, PhD; Addiction Treatment Centre, Health Local Unit, Biella, Italy, EUVia P. Maffei, 59 13836 Cossato (BI); Phone +39 015 9899853; Fax +39 015 9892890; E-Mail: lorenzo.somaini@aslbi.piemonte.it

Summary: The immune system is an organization of cells and molecules with specialized roles in defending against infection. Communication between the central nervous and the immune system lies at the hart of the neuroimmune axis. There are several data indicating that opioids drugs may influence the immune system. One of the main features of opioid induced alteration of immune function is the development of immunosuppression. However, evidence has been provided to suggest that different opioids drugs may have distinctive effects on the immune system. Methadone is a widely used synthetic 3,3-diphenylpropylamine opioid which primarily acts at the µ opioid receptor. Its most common use is in the therapy for opioid dependence. Besides to their therapeutic efficacy, opioids can produce several well known adverse events, and, as has recently been recognized, can positively interfere with the immune response. Infact, data obtain from animal and human studies have demonstrated that long acting opioids drugs such as methadone is devoid of any intrinsic immunosuppressive activity. This effect may partly depend on the ability of methadone to restore the HPA axis function, that is altered in heroin dependent patient, or by the long-lasting activation of opioid receptors both in the central nervous system and on immune competent cells. HIV and HCV infections are the most frequent infectious disease seen in drugs users. Opioids may facilitate the outbreak of infections through marked immunomodulating effects on the immune respsoses against a virus. The enrolment of heroin patient in MMT programs represents a particularly effective measure for the prevention of HCV and HIV virus transmission and the immunorestoring properties of methadone are particularly relevant in the treatment of concurrent infectious such as HCV frequently associated with heroin addiction. It is evident that the possibility to reach an adequate control of addiction and of concomitant infectious diseases choosing either immunosuppressive drugs or drugs characterized by immunoneutral or immunostimulating effects could represent an important point to be considered in the future in opioid therapy.

Publication Type: Seminar

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(3):33-38

Bioethical preferences of supporters and opponents of agonist opioid therapy in Russia

Mendelevich V.

Correspondence: Vladimir Mendelevich, Prof., MD, PhD, Doc.Med.Sci. - Kazan State Medical University, Russia,420012, Kazan, Butlerova str., 49. Phone +79872961795, +78432386074; Fax +78432360393 E-mail: mend@tbit.ru

Summary: Not available

Publication Type: Letter to the editor

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(3):39-40

The pleasure constant

Softic J.

Correspondence: Jasmin Softic, MD - Head of the outpatient clinic, Cantonal Institution for Fighting Addiction, Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina. E-mail: jsoftic@yahoo.com.

Summary: Not available

Publication Type: Letter to the editor


Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(4):5-16

Psychiatric comorbidity in substitution treatment of opioid-dependent patients in primary care: Prevalence and impact on clinical features

Lieb M., Wittchen H. U., Palm U., Apelt S. M., Siegert J., Soyka M.

Correspondence: Dr. Martin Lieb, MD - Dept. of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Klinikum Grosshadern. Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany - Tel: +49 / 89 / 7095-2717 Fax: +49 / 89 / 7095-2715 Email: martin.lieb@med.uni-muenchen.de

Summary: Although elevated rates of psychiatric comorbidity in drug-dependent patients in methadone maintenance treatment are known, differences in comorbidity, maintenance medications, provider settings and somatic morbidities often remain unclear. Here, the prevalence and impact of comorbidity is described in a large, nationally representative sample of substitution patients with a cross-sectional naturalistic study in German buprenorphine or methadone substitution patients. Over two thirds of both the males and females were diagnosed by their physician as having a psychiatric diagnosis other than substance dependence. Depressive and anxiety disorders were the most common diagnoses. Men recorded higher rates for schizophrenic disorders, sleep disorders and antisocial personality disorder, while a higher percentage of women had a borderline personality disorder.

Publication Type: Regular article

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(4):17-22

Methadone maintenance therapy and feto-maternal outcomes of pregnancy

Igboekwu J., Wolff K.

Correspondence: Dr Jide Igboekwu, Specialist registrar in forensic psychiatry. Ravenswood medium secure unit. Fareham, PO17 5NA, United Kingdom. Phone- 01329836000 E-mail- jideigboekwu@googlemail.com

Summary: We studied a cohort of pregnant opioid dependent women (n = 30) on methadone maintenance therapy aiming to identify obstetrics, neonatal and pregnancy outcomes and characteristics including the level of antenatal contact and its effect. There were statistical significant associations between birth weight and use of illicit drug and between use of illicit drugs and gestational age (crack use and length of labour r2 =.57 and r2 = .012. P = 0.05; Cocaine use and type of delivery r2 = .515 and r2 = .006. P = 0.05; Birth weight and length of gestation r2 .429 and r2 = .041. p= 0.05).

Publication Type: Regular article

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(4):23-32

On opioid receptors

Vendramin A., Sciacchitano A.

Correspondence: Andrea Vendramin, MD - Drug Addiction Department - Via dei Colli, 4 - 35100 Padova (Italy). E-mail: andrea.vendramin@unipd.it

Summary: The system of opioid receptors is characterized by a high level of complexity and has received much attention from scientists all over the world. The aim of this article is to describe the present, updated situation regarding scientific knowledge on the subject. Each opioid receptor is distributed in CNS in a distinctive way. Some regions (striate body and dorsal horns of spinal medulla) indicate the three receptor types, although not necessarily in the same neurons. Conversely, other regions, such as the thalamic nucleus for µ or the claustrum for k, show various sites for a single type of receptor. Each receptor is involved in functions that are implemented along different paths and extensions. At present, it seems clear that the role of each receptor in mediating biological actions or physiological effects needs to be deepened using methodologies that differ from the classic ones. It can now be predicted that molecular cloning, re-combining DNA, antisense holigonucleotides, knockout and knockdown techniques will soon make it possible to understand many of the problems which make this system so ‘complicated’.

Publication Type: Seminar

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(4):33-40

Psychotherapeutic management of heroin-addicted patients. Psychopathological, relational and organizing aspects

Bignamini E.

Correspondence: Emanuele Bignamini, MD, Addiction Department 1, ASL Torino 2, Corso Lombardia 187, 10137 Torino, Italy - E-mail: bignamini@aslto2.it

Summary: Addiction is a pathological condition which is still only partly understood. the complexity of reality exceeds our capacity to elaborate and synthesize the information that is currently available, so compelling us to operations of simplification, in order to become operative. In this exposition I will discuss how, starting from a view of addiction as a pathology of relationships, and from a pragmatic vision of the available therapeutic techniques as tools of intervention rather than interpretive theories of realty, is it possible and necessary to evaluate the psychotherapeutic approach.

Publication Type: Seminar

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(4):41-48

Treating heroin addicts. Blocking dosages and stimulation-stabilization of opioidergic system

Pacini M., Maremmani A. G. I., Rovai L., Rugani F., Maremmani I.

Correspondence: Icro Maremmani, MD; Vincent P. Dole Dual Diagnosis Unit, Santa Chiara University Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67 56100 PISA, Italy, EU. Phone +39 0584 790073 Fax +39 0584 72081 E-Mail: maremman@med.unipi.it

Summary: The paper that follows is an attempt to conceptualize a clinically based classification of treatments for heroin addiction. In fact, a distinction is drawn in classifying treatments between those that are antagonists and those that are agonists; the latter can be further subdivided into full and partial. On this view, the effectiveness of full agonists cannot be displayed as dependent on a key antagonist action, originally described as an ‘opioid blockade’ and regarded as the main therapeutic mechanism available against addiction. On the other hand, the differences in levels of effectiveness between antagonists and full agonists cannot be understood either in terms of the presence of absence of antagonism, or as opposing two radically different mechanisms of action (it remains true that they both produce an opioid blockade). In proceeding further, the authors propose the concept of optimal antagonism, which is centred around the original ‘opioid blockade’ mechanism and also accounts for agonist potency providing a direct anticraving effect and aversive effects. Also, acquired tolerance to opiates does function as a drawback deriving from abrupt treatment termination or steep reduction, so as to favour stability of the anticraving coverage. In practice, optimal antagonism is a concept that helps to define the gold standard of retention, clinical response and rehabilitative potential. Naltrexone only provides patients with antagonism, which  does not appear to be the crucial feature of the ‘narcotic blockade’ originally described for full agonists, since levels of global effectiveness differ markedly. The balance between the level of narcotic blockade and other properties corresponds to the level of global effectiveness of a treatment regimen, which eventually explains why complete blockade brings poorer results in the absence of other anticraving actions. Methadone and buprenorphine appear to provide optimal antagonism; in other words, they offer patients opioid blockade combined with tolerance to euphoria and direct anticraving action.

Publication Type: Expert opinion

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(4):49-52

It is time for a responsible administration of gamma hydroxybutyrate and methadone

Caputo F.

Correspondence: Fabio Caputo, M.D., Ph.D.; Department of Internal Medicine, SS Annunziata Hospital, Via Vicini 2, 44042, Cento (Ferrara), Italy; tel: +39-051-6838314; fax: +39-051-6838487; e-mail: f.caputo@ausl.fe.it

Summary: Not Available

Publication Type: Letter to the editor

 

Heroin Addiction and Related Clinical Problems 2010; 12(4):53-56

Opiate maintenance treatment in primary health care in Germany

Ullmann R.

Correspondence: Rainer Ullmann, MD; General Practitioner, Weidenallee 1, 20357 Hamburg, Germany, EU - Phone: +49 40 438081 - Fax: +49 40-438082 or -46960196 - Email r.ullmann@gmx.de

Summary: Not Available

Publication Type: Letter to the editor